I’m currently writing a lengthy article about the reception of Ulysses 1.5b and some users’ reaction; I guess I’ll need to rework it a couple of times just to ensure it’s coming across the way I plan, though then again I really shouldn’t care. It will mostly focus on a comparison of treatments: How some folks accuse us of doing what we’re doing while at the same time they’re praising other developers for incorporating their “suggestions”, which more often than not simply read like copy instructions.
I find this to be awfully strange, and I would like to chatter about it, but I also know that such a post will read like I would write about other developers copying, which is not my intention at all. It’s about users expectations and reaction and such. Like how every other VersionTracker comment on system extensions reads “why isn’t this part of the system” and then how Apple got treated for Dashboard. Or how people call some devs “way off” yet ask their competition for inclusion of every feature of the other product (not Ulysses, mind you; read VT, MU, app forums, etc.)
Then again, folks don’t like it much, when others talk about them, so I will get the usual reation of “how dare you talk like that about your customers”… no way to win here, best to keep my mouth shut, he?
I guess it all boils down to receptions. Stuff people WANT to read into my writings, or generally into writings on problematic subjects. It’s like that Pope vs. Mohammed BS — folks expect some, believe they get some, react as if it was given. Dunno how to deal with that. Guess I’ll just have to try.
We’ll see.
I got some responsibility here; can’t just “wear my freak flag high”, though boy how I wish…
Until then, just a few words: I really appreciate all the feedback we’ve been getting on b3. Max is currently struggling with his phone company, so he won’t appear that much on the forum or be able to answer mail. Yet b4 is coming along nicely, thanks to all these great reports. Keep ‘em coming.